Voice in Narrative and Dialogue - A Contrast of Writing Styles

One of the nice things about being an author isnever use "whom" in speaking or writing because
that we can breakI want to see
any rule we want. (I just did.) It's part of our jobthe distinction scrapped, but that's another
description.story.)The dialogue portion of VIGILANTE
Language changes through usage -- definitions,JUSTICE isn't difficult to
spelling, grammardescribe. The hero is a self-destructive cop
-- and authors can help it do this. But on thenamed Gary Drake. He
other hand, weis based on a real-life cop, my little brother. So
have to have some sort of agreement on thehis dialogue
language or we won'twas easy because, in my mind, I always heard
be able to talk to each other.When we asGary speaking in
authors break a rule or two, it's not becauseBarry's voice.For my other characters, I had to
we'refind some other voices. For
ignorant. It's because we have reasons to breakexample, the voice of Doctor Garrett Allison is,
them. That's oneto me, that of
of the joys of writing.Having said that, now I'mMichael Jordan.That's right, people. When I write, I
going to explain some rules. There areliterally hear voices in my
two types of writing in your novel. There is yourhead.As a beginning writer, and not a very good
narrative andone, I read some advice
there is your dialogue. The rules for the two aresomewhere saying you might want to cut
not the same.For example, comma use. Inphotos out of magazines and
dialogue, it's not so difficult. Putuse them when writing your physical description,
in a comma wherever your speaker pauses in hisin case you can't
her speaking. Inform a mental picture of your characters. I've
narrative, you have to consult the style guidesused this technique,
and hope that youand with some modification I've extended it to
and your editor, working as a team, can sort it allvoices.As an author, you should always play to
out.NARRATIVEA cop thriller like my VIGILANTEyour greatest strengths
JUSTICE has a simple set ofwhile working to improve your weaknesses. I
rules for the narrative portion. Third-person,know many authors who
straightforwardthink visually, and I envy them that. I've read
writing, light on adjectives and adverbs, easy tosome stuff that
read andcan make you feel you're skiing down a
grammatically correct. Sentence fragments aresnow-covered mountain when
acceptable ifit's actually 85 degrees in your flat and you've
communication is achieved, and you'll note that Inever skied in
use them oftenyour life.One author told me that when he writes,
in this article. Why? Simply because it's morehe literally sees movies
effective thatin his head, then just has to type them really
way.To a degree the genre will help you identifyfast because
what's appropriate.that's how they're playing. Lucky him! My novels
For a cop drama, write in the dry style of afirst come to me
journalist. Forin snippets of dialogue. Every character has the
horror, a bit of hyperbole may be acceptable insame voice at
the most dramaticthat stage. (My voice, of course.)Tight dialogue is
sections. For romance (not my genre), you canone thing I enjoy when I read. Here are the
probably use lotscharacters at some sort of verbal showdown. I
more adjectives (swollen, heaving, throbbing, etc.)know them, I know
than you'dtheir motives, I can read between the lines and
normally dare.When I wrote RISING FROM THEknow what's being
ASHES, the true story of Mom raisingleft unsaid. I can just feel the tension in the air.
my brother and me alone, I tried to adopt aI'm not so
"childlike voice"much mentally picturing bulging veins and angry
early in the narrative. As the character of Michaelglares as I am
thejust feeling the spoken words.I also have an
storyteller grew older, I abandoned that childlikeexcellent memory of voices. I always have. Like a
quality. (Andog remembers scents or an artist colors, it
entire book of that would get old fastseems, I can
anyway.)When I wrote AN AMERICAN REDNECKremember voices. If I hear an unfamiliar song on
IN HONG KONG, the humorousthe radio but
sequel, I once again used first person narrative.I've ever heard that singer before, I can tell you
But thewho it is. I
narrative of RISING is first person only in that itcan tell you that the guy doing the voice of
uses "I"Gomez Addams in the
instead of "Michael." Michael is only a camera. Itoriginal Addams Family cartoon is now doing one
still followsof the voices in
all the rules of "conventional" narrative. Inthe Tasmanian Devil's cartoon series. I can spot
REDNECK, I threwan actor like
most of the rules out the window.I used whatAndreas Katsulas no matter what species of
one author referred to my as "conversational"rubberized alien he's
tone toplaying, because I recognize his voice, although
maximum effect in REDNECK. This fellow authorreally that's no
felt like he wasn'tgreat challenge in his case.(For the record, if
so much reading my book as just listening to meyou've read THE CHRONICLES OF A MADMAN,
tell some storiesAhriman looks and sounds like Andreas Katsulas.
over a few beers. That's exactly what IClyde Windham is
wanted.When I wrote the sequel to REDNECK,Dennis Franz. Wendy Himes is some girl who sold
another bit of humor calledme some horse
WHO MOVED MY RICE?, I chose to keep thatfeed about 15 years ago.)But just "hearing" the
same narrative style,voices (if you're able) isn't enough. The
which I'd spent three years perfecting in mywords themselves will be different depending on
newsletter.In RISING, while I was the "firstwho's speaking
person" character, I wasn'tthem, even if they're relaying the same
really the book's focus. In REDNECK and RICE, Iinformation.To get back to VIGILANTE JUSTICE,
am. Center stage,Gary Drake doesn't use a lot of
in the spotlight. Using more of a "dialogue" style inwords. He almost never describes his own
what shouldfeelings, and if he does
have been "narrative" allowed me to focus thehe always feels guilty about it. He speaks with a
reader's attentionSouthern drawl.
on the first person to a greater degree thanHe tends to use a single swear word, and that
simply describing himword is "f*ck."Marjorie Brooks, on the other hand,
ever could. You may love me or you may hatementions feelings and uses
me, but you'll knowwhichever swear word is the most accurate,
me and you'll laugh at me. Or, in the case ofexcept that she never
RICE, you'll feel mysays "f*ck." Doctor Allison doesn't use as many
frequent confusion. I had to write that from "mycontractions as
perspective"the rest of us do. These are things I kept in
because it was often the only one Imind as I wrote
understood.If you want to see such a techniquetheir dialogue.Who remembers Mr. Spock? His
used to maximum effect, Ispeech sounds like written language,
recommend A MONK SWIMMING by Malachyvery grammatical and correct, and that's
McCourt. (I read it afterdeliberate. He's a
writing REDNECK, by the way.) It's about anscientist, he's logical, and for him language is a
actor who gets drunktool to be used
and does very bad things to himself and hiswith as much precision as possible. That isn't just
family, and it'sa different
amazing just how much I laughed out loudstyle of dialogue; it helps define his character.In
reading it. Doesn'tTHE CHRONICLES OF A MADMAN, Ahriman used
sound like a funny subject, does it? It's not, andfewer contractions
yet it is,than the rest of us and he avoided sentence
thanks to his unconventional narrative style.To tellfragments. He
you the truth, I don't even think McCourt "wrote"probably even knew the difference between
thatwho and whom or lie and
book. I think he just said it all into a tapelay. That's because he's intelligent, you see. It
recorder andkinds of goes
transcribed it later. It reads that much like "a guywith the territory when one is evil
at the pubincarnate.During an edit I did of a sci-fi book, I
telling a tale." If he used the grammar checkingsaw that the author wasn't
function inusing contractions in dialogue. I made many
MSWord, I bet it underlined every sentence. And,suggestions that he
bright fellowchange the dialogue of the humans to use those
that he is, he ignored them all and didn't change acontractions,
word.If you're going to use a more conversationalexcept when military officers were giving orders,
tone in yourbecause
narrative, don't think that means you just writeorder-giving officers tend to be more "serious"
something downand "thoughtful"
and don't have to edit it. You still have tothan folks just being regular folks.I also
organize yoursuggested to this author that he change nothing
thoughts, and that means rewriting. While yourabout the
style may be"stilted" speech patterns of his aliens. English isn't
unconventional, you have to make the ideastheir
easy for the reader tonative language, you see, and one thing I've
follow.(I'm not entirely serious when I saynoticed from living
McCourt just spoke into ain China is that the locals don't use nearly as
tape recorder, and even if he did that doesn'tmany contractions
mean the rest ofas I do. So I thought that added realism. Plus, the
us can get away with it.)In the case of narrative,contrast
you have the choice. If you want toshould help the readers keep everybody straight
spotlight the storyteller to maximum effect, youeven if they aren't
can go withconsciously aware of why.I remember in one edit
first person and let the storyteller's narrative andwhere I read some character saying, "I am
his dialoguean historian." Oh, I hate that phrase. I hate
read the same. If you'd prefer to "move theanyone ever putting
camera" back a bit,"an" in front of a word that begins with the
make the narrative conventional in contrast toconsonant "h." It's
the dialogue. As aterribly pretentious and arrhythmic. As I kept
rule, this reader likes contrast, because he getsreading the
bored readingbook, I quickly learned that the character in
the same thing over and over again unless thequestion is
style is reallyterribly pretentious. Nobody else in the book was
special. Or perhaps you can find a pointthrowing "an"
somewhere in between.Every story has a wayin front of "h" words. It was a deliberate contrast
that it should be told for maximum effect.on the
Maximum effect in the author's eyes, of course,author's part, and it worked quite
as it's anicely.CONCLUSIONI suppose the point of all this
subjective thing. Keep it in mind as you write.is, remember the difference
Make the call,between narrative and dialogue.In the case of
stick to it, change it if it's not working. It mightnarrative, you're simply trying to describe what
even be okayhappens. There is a famous quote of some sort
to be inconsistent, but only if you do sothat says, "Great
deliberately. Just keepwriting is like a window pane." Stick to that
stuff like "ease of reading" and "maximummaxim unless you
effect" in mind and befeel you have a good reason not to. If you've
creative.DIALOGUEHave you ever read a bookgot what it takes
where the dialogue reads like narrative?to make your writing style superior to the
I hope you haven't. But as an editor I've seenconventional, and if
such things, andyour story allows it, let that style be an asset of
they're very ugly.Do you know why they're soyour writing.
ugly? Because they remind the readerOtherwise, just stick to the rules until you
of the one thing an author does not want tomaster them.In the case of dialogue, you're trying
remind the reader of.to write something that
Namely, that every character on the page is asounds like what the characters would actually
puppet under thesay, but a bit
author's control.As readers, we put that thoughtmore organized because "real" speech can be
aside so we can enjoy reading.boring. Give every
"Willing suspension of disbelief," to quote thecharacter his/her/its own voice.Am I joking when
phrase an EnglishI say "its?" Not entirely. THE CHRONICLES OF A
teacher used when describing the performanceMADMAN contains a short story, written in first
of Shakespeare'sperson from my
plays. If the author ensures that the reader can'tdog's viewpoint. But then again, I would never call
suspendDaisy an
disbelief, the book will not be read. Stilted dialogue"it."There's a stylistic decision you can make in
is one ofnarrative, by the
the quickest ways to make that happen.I'veway. I always refer to animals as "he" or "she."
decided that writing dialogue is the hardest thingSome authors
we do.always use "it."In dialogue, you can let some
It's certainly not something we can go look up incharacters always say he or she,
a style manualand let others always say it, to contrast the
like Strunk or Turabian.What are the rules? "Makefeeling with the
it sound real." But with the corollary,unfeeling. (My heroes never call an animal "it.")In
"not too real because people always say um andthe end, the goal is always the same. Make your
er and crap likewriting as
that." Oh yeah. That explains everything! End ofeasy to read as you can. Keep that in mind, and
my article,always keep
right?Nope. I'm still writing it.Ideally, the greatestlearning, and you won't go wrong.Copyright 2005,
of the great creators of dialogue will haveMichael LaRoccaMichael LaRocca's website at was
every character "speaking" in a voice sochosen by WRITER'S DIGEST as one of The 101
distinctive that he/sheBest Websites
need never identify the speaker. Okay, that'sFor Writers in 2001 and 2002. His response was
enough fiction.to throw it
Back to reality. None of us are writing dialogueout and start over again because he's insane. He
that well, areteaches
we?People use a lot more contractions in speechEnglish at a university in Hangzhou, Zhejiang
than in writing.Province,
They're faster. More sentence fragments, too.China, and publishes the free weekly newsletter
People very oftenWHO MOVED
use the wrong version of lie/lay or who/whom inMY RICE?
speaking. (I