The truth about UFO sightings


Rendlesham Forest Incident

The Rendlesham Forest Incident is the nameemitting above the trees. In the center of
given to a series of reported sightings ofthe lighted area directly in the center
unexplained lights and objects in the sky,ground level, there was a red light blinking
and the alleged landing of anon and off 5 to 10 sec intervals. And a blue
extraterrestrial spacecraft, in Decemberlight that was being for the most part
1980, in the vicinity of Rendlesham Forest,steady."
Suffolk, England. Along with the Berwyn
Mountain Incident, it is perhaps the mostThere were some strange noises, too.
famous UFO event to have happened in Britain,Burroughs reported a noise "like a woman was
ranking amongst the best-known UFO eventsscreaming" and also that "you could hear the
worldwide. It has been compared to thefarm animals making a lot of noises".
Roswell UFO incident in the United States andHowever, wildlife experts note that there
is, amongst Americans, commonly referred towere no animals on the nearby farm and that
as "Britain's Roswell" or the "Englishthe noises were most likely made by wild
Roswell".animals such as deer. Burroughs' statement
also states that "We could see a beacon going
Sceptical  viewpointsaround so we went towards it. We followed it
for about two miles [3 km] before we could
Sceptics dismiss the more extreme claims and[see]  it  was  coming  from  a light house."
offer rational explanations of the observed
phenomena: for instance they claim that thePenniston's statement is the only one that
initial sighting of an object apparentlypositively identifies a mechanical object as
descending into the forest was caused by athe source of the lights. He states that he
bright fireball and that the flashing lightwas within 50 metres of the object and "it
subsequently seen from the forest edge waswas  defidently mechlanical in nature" [sic].
caused by the beam from a nearby lighthouse;
nor, they say, was there anything unusualThe witnesses were unnerved by their
about the radiation levels. Believers do notexperience and believed that they had
accept that the sceptics can adequatelywitnessed something, as Buran expresses it,
refute eyewitness, documentary, photographic"out  of  the  realm  of  explanation".
and  radiological  evidence.
The  Halt  Tape
Following the event, the Ministry of Defence
(MoD) denied that it posed any threat toAlso, in 1984, a copy of what became known as
national security and that it was thus neverthe "Halt Tape" fell into the hands of
investigated as a security matter. However,researchers. Unfortunately, because of static
later evidence indicated that there was aand the fact that the tape had been dubbed on
substantial MoD file on the subject and thisan old machine, much of its background
has led to claims of a cover-up. Some haveconversations could not be discerned. The US
interpreted this as part of a larger patternSci Fi Channel has now acquired the original
of suppression of information in regard torecording, which documents Lt. Colonel Halt
UFO/Alien existence/knowledge by both the US(USAF) and his patrol investigating a UFO
and  UK  Governmentssighting in Rendlesham Forest in December
1980. This tape not only reveals much more of
Like the Roswell incident, it occurred in thethe background conversations but features
proximity of two military bases, RAFnames that could not be heard on the
Woodbridge and RAF Bentwaters (nowpoor-quality 1984 dub. The tape has also been
abandoned), which were being used by thetranscribed by researcher Ian Ridpath, who
United States Air Force (USAF), eight milesincludes  a  link  to  an  audio  download.
(13 km) outside Ipswich, Suffolk. At the time
these USAF/RAF NATO bases were under theSuffolk  Police  log
command of Major General Gordon E. Williams
(ret.) and under the Deputy Base CommanderSuffolk Constabulary have a record, dated 26
Colonel  Charles  I  Halt.December 1980, of a report from the law
Enforcement Desk of RAF Woodbridge, stating
Rendlesham Forest is owned by the Forestrythat "We have a sighting of some unusual
Commission and consists of approximately 15lights in the sky, we have sent some unarmed
square kilometres (3700 acres) of coniferoustroops to investigate, we are terming it as a
plantations, interspersed with broadleavedU.F.O. at present". The police investigated
belts, heathland and wetland areas. It isthis report and the result is recorded as
located in the county of Suffolk, about eightfollows: "Air Traffic Control West Drayton
miles (13 km) to the east of the town ofchecked. No knowledge of aircraft. Reports
Ipswich. The two airforce bases in the areareceived of aerial phenomena over southern
(both being used by the USAF, at the time)England during the night. Only lights visible
were RAF Bentwaters, which is situated justthis area was from Orford light house. Search
to the north of the forest, and RAFmade of area - negative." A scan of the
Woodbridge which extends into the forest fromreport is available at Suffolk Constabulary's
the  west.website.
The main events of the incident, includingOther  military  installation  involvement
the supposed "landing", took place in the
forest, almost a mile (1600 m) to the east ofSome researchers have claimed that personnel
the  main  east  gate  of  RAF  Woodbridge.from Porton Down [4] visited Rendlesham in
1980 after the Rendlesham Forest Incident.
Orford Ness lighthouse is about six miles (10However, no evidence has been presented and
km)  almost  due  east  of  this  location.there seems to be confusion with other
alleged  UFO  incidents.
26  December
Lord Hill-Norton (himself a reviewer of
On the evening of 26 December 1980, aBruni's book on the incident, mentioned
resident of Sudbourne, a villagebelow) asked Her Majesty's Government:
approximately 6 miles (10 km) to the North"Whether they are aware of any involvement by
East of Rendlesham Forest, reported aSpecial Branch in the investigation of the
mysterious shape (like an upturned mushroom)1980 Rendlesham Forest Incident [HL303]".
in the sky above his garden. An UnidentifiedBaroness Symons of Vernham Dean gave the
Flying Object was also reported at the nearbyreply that "Special Branch officers may have
USAF Woodbridge air base, where servicemenbeen aware of the incident but would not have
initially thought it was a downed aeroplaneshown any interest unless there was evidence
but, upon entering the forest to investigate,of a potential threat to national security.
they saw many strange lights moving throughNo such interest appears to have been shown."
the trees, as well as a blinding light from(Quoted in Georgina Bruni's book You Can't
an  unidentified  object.Tell  the  People)
Some of the airmen claim to have seen aThe British Government has released its files
conical metallic object, suspended in ato researchers (with the exception of a small
yellow mist, hovering over a clearing in thenumber of documents) [5], [6], [7], but the
trees, with a pulsating blue and red circleUnited States continues to remain silent
of light above. One eyewitness claims to havedespite the SciFi Channel-sponsored
seen triangular landing gear on the object.investigation entitled "UFO Invasion at
The servicemen further claimed that theRendlesham", the History Channel's "UFO Files
object seemed clearly aware of their presence- Britain's Roswell" and Coalition for
and moved away from them, forcing them toFreedom  of  Information  inquiries.
give chase. Later the servicemen were said to
have been found in a dazed state, and someOther  possible  explanations
reports claim that local farmyard and
domestic animals had been behaving in a stateScience writer Ian Ridpath investigated the
of  fear  and  panic.incident, initially for BBC TV's Breakfast
Time, and on 5 January 1985 wrote an article
The airmen were allegedly debriefed,for The Guardian that did much to discredit
threatened and ordered to sign documents thatthe accounts of the UFO sightings at
vowed silence; one even claimed to have beenRendlesham. Ridpath asked local residents
forced to sign a document claiming the UFOabout the lights, and most of them indicated
was a lighthouse. Some reports suggest thatthat the light originated from a nearby
they were reportedly ordered to stay quiet,lighthouse, which can create the impression
with  the  warning  "bullets  are  cheap".of a light hovering slightly above the
ground, especially in weather conditions
The next morning, servicemen returned to thewhere there are patches of freezing mist
small clearing where the conical object hadamongst the trees. Also, if a UFO was
been seen, and found three small impressionspresent, the airmen should have reported a
in a triangular pattern, as well as burnsecond source of light (the lighthouse). In
marks  and  broken  branches on nearby trees.the Halt tape (mentioned above), one can hear
an unidentified airman call out "There it is
28  Decemberagain...there it is." with the same frequency
at which the Orford Ness lighthouse flashes.
They returned again on the evening of 28Further analysis of the case can be found on
December with radiation detectors, althoughRidpath's  website  [9].
the significance of the readings they
obtained is disputed . That night, the lightsLocals in the area also believed the alleged
returned, and the servicemen witnessed a"landing marks" simply to be "rabbit
bright flashing light between the trees.diggings." Moreover, the supposed burn marks
There are claims that the incident wasin the trees were actually axe cuts that
videoed by the USAF; but the resulting tapeindicated the trees were ready to be felled.
has  not  been  made  public.To give further pause to accepting the
alleged UFO sighting, a meteor "almost as
It has been rumoured that small beings withbright as the full Moon" was spotted over
domed heads left the craft, and that twinsouthern England at exactly the time of the
base commander Gordon Williams claimed toinitial reports of a bright object "landing"
have made sign language communication within the forest, according to Dr John Mason,
the aliens. These rumours have no evidence towho collects reports of meteor sightings for
back them up, and come from unconfirmedthe  British  Astronomical  Association.
reports.
Crucial amongst the evidence is the recording
Primary  and  secondary  sourcesof high levels of radiation in the area
(clearly heard on the "Halt tape"). Ridpath
The first public report of the incident waspoints out that the equipment used for this
published in the tabloid newspaper News ofmeasurement was not intended to measure
the World, on 2 October 1983, beneath thebackground radiation and therefore the
sensational headline UFO lands in Suffolkreadings at the low end of the measurement
– and that's official. The story wasscale  are  meaningless.
based on an account by a former US airman,
using the pseudonym Art Wallace (supposedlySteuart Campbell proposes an alternative
to protect himself against retribution fromexplanation. He suggests that the incident
the USAF), although his real name was Larrybegan with the sighting of a fireball
Warren.(bolide) which was seen to the east and
interpreted by guards at the base as an
The  Halt  memoaircraft falling in flames in the nearby
forest. In fact it would have been hundreds
Letter from Lt. Col. Charles HaltThe firstof miles away over the North Sea. Campbell
piece of primary evidence to be madeargues that the object subsequently seen by
available to the public was a memorandumHalt and his men on their nocturnal
written by the deputy base commander, Lt.expedition was the Shipwash lightship and
Col. Charles I. Halt, to the Ministry ofthat the supposed "spacecraft" were actually
Defence (MOD). Known as the "Halt memo", thisbright planets. Campbell is critical of the
was made available publicly in the UnitedUSAF's  abilities  with  their  equipment.
States under the US Freedom of Information
Act. The memorandum (left), was dated "13 JanAnother theory is that the incident was a
81" and headed "Unexplained Lights". Thehoax. The BBC reported that a former US
two-week delay between the incident and thesecurity policeman, Kevin Conde, claimed
report might account for errors in dates andresponsibility for creating strange lights in
times  given.the forest by driving around in a police
vehicle whose lights he had modified.
Statements from the eyewitnesses on 26However, he is "unsure exactly when the prank
Decembertook place, and therefore is not sure if he
was inadvertently responsible for the
The Scottish reseacher James Easton succeededso-called UFO incident." Kevin Conde now
in obtaining the original witness statementsstates (2005) that he was not responsible for
made for Col. Halt by Fred A. Buran, 81stthe incident. He said this long before he was
Security Police Squadron, Airman First Classfamously interviewed by the BBC 'Inside Out'
John Burroughs, 81st Security Policeor the Daily Mail Newspaper. "This incident
Squadron, Airman Edward N. Cabansag, 81st[hoax] occurred right after Christmas. For
Security Police Squadron, Master-Sergeant J.reasons that are hard to explain it is my
D. Chandler, 81st Security Police Squadronimpression that I pulled my stunt during an
and Staff-Sergeant Jim Penniston, 81stexercise. We would not have had an exercise
Security Police Squadron. These documents areduring the Christmas holiday. That is a
now in the public domain and scans of themstrong indication that my stunt is not the
are  available  on  Ian  Ridpath's  website.source  of  this  specific  incident".
These documents describe the sightings ofOther explanations for the incident have
strange lights. Penniston, for instance,included a downed Soviet spy satellite or a
states that a "large yellow glowing light wasnuclear incident.



1 A B C D E 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 100 101 102 103 104 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116