The truth about UFO sightings


Rendlesham Forest Incident

The Rendlesham Forest Incident is thelight that was being for the most part
name given to a series of reportedsteady."
sightings of unexplained lights andThere were some strange noises, too.
objects in the sky, and the allegedBurroughs reported a noise "like a woman
landing of an extraterrestrialwas screaming" and also that "you could
spacecraft, in December 1980, in thehear the farm animals making a lot of
vicinity of Rendlesham Forest, Suffolk,noises". However, wildlife experts note
England. Along with the Berwyn Mountainthat there were no animals on the nearby
Incident, it is perhaps the most famousfarm and that the noises were most
UFO event to have happened in Britain,likely made by wild animals such as
ranking amongst the best-known UFOdeer. Burroughs' statement also states
events worldwide. It has been comparedthat "We could see a beacon going around
to the Roswell UFO incident in theso we went towards it. We followed it
United States and is, amongst Americans,for about two miles [3 km] before we
commonly referred to as "Britain'scould [see] it was coming from a light
Roswell" or the "English Roswell".house."
Sceptical viewpointsPenniston's statement is the only one
Sceptics dismiss the more extreme claimsthat positively identifies a mechanical
and offer rational explanations of theobject as the source of the lights. He
observed phenomena: for instance theystates that he was within 50 metres of
claim that the initial sighting of anthe object and "it was defidently
object apparently descending into themechlanical in nature" [sic].
forest was caused by a bright fireballThe witnesses were unnerved by their
and that the flashing light subsequentlyexperience and believed that they had
seen from the forest edge was caused bywitnessed something, as Buran expresses
the beam from a nearby lighthouse; nor,it, "out of the realm of explanation".
they say, was there anything unusualThe Halt Tape
about the radiation levels. Believers doAlso, in 1984, a copy of what became
not accept that the sceptics canknown as the "Halt Tape" fell into the
adequately refute eyewitness,hands of researchers. Unfortunately,
documentary, photographic andbecause of static and the fact that the
radiological evidence.tape had been dubbed on an old machine,
Following the event, the Ministry ofmuch of its background conversations
Defence (MoD) denied that it posed anycould not be discerned. The US Sci Fi
threat to national security and that itChannel has now acquired the original
was thus never investigated as arecording, which documents Lt. Colonel
security matter. However, later evidenceHalt (USAF) and his patrol investigating
indicated that there was a substantiala UFO sighting in Rendlesham Forest in
MoD file on the subject and this has ledDecember 1980. This tape not only
to claims of a cover-up. Some havereveals much more of the background
interpreted this as part of a largerconversations but features names that
pattern of suppression of information incould not be heard on the poor-quality
regard to UFO/Alien existence/knowledge1984 dub. The tape has also been
by both the US and UK Governmentstranscribed by researcher Ian Ridpath,
Like the Roswell incident, it occurredwho includes a link to an audio
in the proximity of two military bases,download.
RAF Woodbridge and RAF Bentwaters (nowSuffolk Police log
abandoned), which were being used by theSuffolk Constabulary have a record,
United States Air Force (USAF), eightdated 26 December 1980, of a report from
miles (13 km) outside Ipswich, Suffolk.the law Enforcement Desk of RAF
At the time these USAF/RAF NATO basesWoodbridge, stating that "We have a
were under the command of Major Generalsighting of some unusual lights in the
Gordon E. Williams (ret.) and under thesky, we have sent some unarmed troops to
Deputy Base Commander Colonel Charles Iinvestigate, we are terming it as a
Halt.U.F.O. at present". The police
Rendlesham Forest is owned by theinvestigated this report and the result
Forestry Commission and consists ofis recorded as follows: "Air Traffic
approximately 15 square kilometres (3700Control West Drayton checked. No
acres) of coniferous plantations,knowledge of aircraft. Reports received
interspersed with broadleaved belts,of aerial phenomena over southern
heathland and wetland areas. It isEngland during the night. Only lights
located in the county of Suffolk, aboutvisible this area was from Orford light
eight miles (13 km) to the east of thehouse. Search made of area - negative."
town of Ipswich. The two airforce basesA scan of the report is available at
in the area (both being used by theSuffolk Constabulary's website.
USAF, at the time) were RAF Bentwaters,Other military installation involvement
which is situated just to the north ofSome researchers have claimed that
the forest, and RAF Woodbridge whichpersonnel from Porton Down [4] visited
extends into the forest from the west.Rendlesham in 1980 after the Rendlesham
The main events of the incident,Forest Incident. However, no evidence
including the supposed "landing", tookhas been presented and there seems to be
place in the forest, almost a mile (1600confusion with other alleged UFO
m) to the east of the main east gate ofincidents.
RAF Woodbridge.Lord Hill-Norton (himself a reviewer of
Orford Ness lighthouse is about sixBruni's book on the incident, mentioned
miles (10 km) almost due east of thisbelow) asked Her Majesty's Government:
location."Whether they are aware of any
26 Decemberinvolvement by Special Branch in the
On the evening of 26 December 1980, ainvestigation of the 1980 Rendlesham
resident of Sudbourne, a villageForest Incident [HL303]". Baroness
approximately 6 miles (10 km) to theSymons of Vernham Dean gave the reply
North East of Rendlesham Forest,that "Special Branch officers may have
reported a mysterious shape (like anbeen aware of the incident but would not
upturned mushroom) in the sky above hishave shown any interest unless there was
garden. An Unidentified Flying Objectevidence of a potential threat to
was also reported at the nearby USAFnational security. No such interest
Woodbridge air base, where servicemenappears to have been shown." (Quoted in
initially thought it was a downedGeorgina Bruni's book You Can't Tell the
aeroplane but, upon entering the forestPeople)
to investigate, they saw many strangeThe British Government has released its
lights moving through the trees, as wellfiles to researchers (with the exception
as a blinding light from an unidentifiedof a small number of documents) [5],
object.[6], [7], but the United States
Some of the airmen claim to have seen acontinues to remain silent despite the
conical metallic object, suspended in aSciFi Channel-sponsored investigation
yellow mist, hovering over a clearing inentitled "UFO Invasion at Rendlesham",
the trees, with a pulsating blue and redthe History Channel's "UFO Files -
circle of light above. One eyewitnessBritain's Roswell" and Coalition for
claims to have seen triangular landingFreedom of Information inquiries.
gear on the object. The servicemenOther possible explanations
further claimed that the object seemedScience writer Ian Ridpath investigated
clearly aware of their presence andthe incident, initially for BBC TV's
moved away from them, forcing them toBreakfast Time, and on 5 January 1985
give chase. Later the servicemen werewrote an article for The Guardian that
said to have been found in a dazeddid much to discredit the accounts of
state, and some reports claim that localthe UFO sightings at Rendlesham. Ridpath
farmyard and domestic animals had beenasked local residents about the lights,
behaving in a state of fear and panic.and most of them indicated that the
The airmen were allegedly debriefed,light originated from a nearby
threatened and ordered to sign documentslighthouse, which can create the
that vowed silence; one even claimed toimpression of a light hovering slightly
have been forced to sign a documentabove the ground, especially in weather
claiming the UFO was a lighthouse. Someconditions where there are patches of
reports suggest that they werefreezing mist amongst the trees. Also,
reportedly ordered to stay quiet, withif a UFO was present, the airmen should
the warning "bullets are cheap".have reported a second source of light
The next morning, servicemen returned to(the lighthouse). In the Halt tape
the small clearing where the conical(mentioned above), one can hear an
object had been seen, and found threeunidentified airman call out "There it
small impressions in a triangularis again...there it is." with the same
pattern, as well as burn marks andfrequency at which the Orford Ness
broken branches on nearby trees.lighthouse flashes. Further analysis of
28 Decemberthe case can be found on Ridpath's
They returned again on the evening of 28website [9].
December with radiation detectors,Locals in the area also believed the
although the significance of thealleged "landing marks" simply to be
readings they obtained is disputed ."rabbit diggings." Moreover, the
That night, the lights returned, and thesupposed burn marks in the trees were
servicemen witnessed a bright flashingactually axe cuts that indicated the
light between the trees. There aretrees were ready to be felled. To give
claims that the incident was videoed byfurther pause to accepting the alleged
the USAF; but the resulting tape has notUFO sighting, a meteor "almost as bright
been made public.as the full Moon" was spotted over
It has been rumoured that small beingssouthern England at exactly the time of
with domed heads left the craft, andthe initial reports of a bright object
that twin base commander Gordon Williams"landing" in the forest, according to Dr
claimed to have made sign languageJohn Mason, who collects reports of
communication with the aliens. Thesemeteor sightings for the British
rumours have no evidence to back themAstronomical Association.
up, and come from unconfirmed reports.Crucial amongst the evidence is the
Primary and secondary sourcesrecording of high levels of radiation in
The first public report of the incidentthe area (clearly heard on the "Halt
was published in the tabloid newspapertape"). Ridpath points out that the
News of the World, on 2 October 1983,equipment used for this measurement was
beneath the sensational headline UFOnot intended to measure background
lands in Suffolk – and that'sradiation and therefore the readings at
official. The story was based on anthe low end of the measurement scale are
account by a former US airman, using themeaningless.
pseudonym Art Wallace (supposedly toSteuart Campbell proposes an alternative
protect himself against retribution fromexplanation. He suggests that the
the USAF), although his real name wasincident began with the sighting of a
Larry Warren.fireball (bolide) which was seen to the
The Halt memoeast and interpreted by guards at the
Letter from Lt. Col. Charles HaltThebase as an aircraft falling in flames in
first piece of primary evidence to bethe nearby forest. In fact it would have
made available to the public was abeen hundreds of miles away over the
memorandum written by the deputy baseNorth Sea. Campbell argues that the
commander, Lt. Col. Charles I. Halt, toobject subsequently seen by Halt and his
the Ministry of Defence (MOD). Known asmen on their nocturnal expedition was
the "Halt memo", this was made availablethe Shipwash lightship and that the
publicly in the United States under thesupposed "spacecraft" were actually
US Freedom of Information Act. Thebright planets. Campbell is critical of
memorandum (left), was dated "13 Jan 81"the USAF's abilities with their
and headed "Unexplained Lights". Theequipment.
two-week delay between the incident andAnother theory is that the incident was
the report might account for errors ina hoax. The BBC reported that a former
dates and times given.US security policeman, Kevin Conde,
Statements from the eyewitnesses on 26claimed responsibility for creating
Decemberstrange lights in the forest by driving
The Scottish reseacher James Eastonaround in a police vehicle whose lights
succeeded in obtaining the originalhe had modified. However, he is "unsure
witness statements made for Col. Halt byexactly when the prank took place, and
Fred A. Buran, 81st Security Policetherefore is not sure if he was
Squadron, Airman First Class Johninadvertently responsible for the
Burroughs, 81st Security Policeso-called UFO incident." Kevin Conde
Squadron, Airman Edward N. Cabansag,now states (2005) that he was not
81st Security Police Squadron,responsible for the incident. He said
Master-Sergeant J. D. Chandler, 81stthis long before he was famously
Security Police Squadron andinterviewed by the BBC 'Inside Out' or
Staff-Sergeant Jim Penniston, 81stthe Daily Mail Newspaper. "This incident
Security Police Squadron. These[hoax] occurred right after Christmas.
documents are now in the public domainFor reasons that are hard to explain it
and scans of them are available on Ianis my impression that I pulled my stunt
Ridpath's website.during an exercise. We would not have
These documents describe the sightingshad an exercise during the Christmas
of strange lights. Penniston, forholiday. That is a strong indication
instance, states that a "large yellowthat my stunt is not the source of this
glowing light was emitting above thespecific incident".
trees. In the center of the lighted areaOther explanations for the incident have
directly in the center ground level,included a downed Soviet spy satellite
there was a red light blinking on andor a nuclear incident.
off 5 to 10 sec intervals. And a blue



1 A B C D E 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116