SETI (Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence) and the Aliens Conundrum - Part I

The various projects that comprise the 45-yearscourse, dubious.
old Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence (SETI)Argument Number 4: Aliens are too alien to be
raise two important issuesrecognized
I. The Six Arguments against SETICarbon-based life forms may be an aberration or
The various projects that comprise the 45-yearsthe rule, no one knows. The diversionist and
old Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence (SETI)convergionist schools of evolution are equally
raise two important issues:speculative as are the basic assumptions of both
(1) do Aliens exist andastrobiology and xenobiology. The rest of the
(2) can we communicate with them.universe may be populated with silicon, or
If they do and we can, how come we nevernitrogen-phosphorus based races or with
encountered an extraterrestrial, let alone spokeninformation-waves or contain numerous,
to or corresponded with one?non-interacting "shadow biospheres".
There are six basic explanations to this apparentRecent discoveries of extremophile unicellular
conundrum and they are not mutually exclusive:organisms lend credence to the belief that life can
(1) That Aliens do not exist;exist almost under any circumstances and in all
(2) That the technology they use is far tooconditions and that the range of planetary
advanced to be detected by us and, the flip sidehabitability is much larger than thought.
of this hypothesis, that the technology we us isBut whatever their chemical composition, most
insufficiently advanced to be noticed by them;Alien species are likely to be sentient and
(3) That we are looking for extraterrestrials atintelligent. Intelligence is bound to be the great
the wrong places;equalizer and the Universal Translator in our
(4) That the Aliens are life forms so different toUniverse. We may fail to recognize certain
us that we fail to recognize them as sentientextragalactic races as life-forms but we are
beings or to communicate with them;unlikely to mistake their intelligence for a naturally
(5) That Aliens are trying to communicate with usoccurring phenomenon. We are equipped to know
but constantly fail due to a variety of hindrances,other sentient intelligent species regardless of how
some structural and some circumstantial;advanced and different they are - and they are
(6) That they are avoiding us because of ourequally fitted to acknowledge us as such.
misconduct (example: the alleged destruction ofArgument Number 5: We are failing to
the environment) or because of our traits (forcommunicate with Aliens
instance, our innate belligerence) or because ofThe hidden assumption underlying CETI/METI
ethical considerations.(Communication with ETI/Messaging to ETI) is
Argument Number 1: Aliens do not exist (thethat Aliens, like humans, are inclined to
Fermi Principle)communicate. This may be untrue. The propensity
The assumption that life has arisen only on Earthfor interpersonal communication (let alone the
is both counterintuitive and unlikely. Rather, it isinter-species variety) may not be universal.
highly probable that life is an extensive parameterAdditionally, Aliens may not possess the same
of the Universe. In other words, that it is assense organs that we do (eyes) and may not be
pervasive and ubiquitous as are other generativeacquainted with our mathematics and geometry.
phenomena, such as star formation.Reality can be successfully described and captured
This does not mean that extraterrestrial life andby alternative mathematical systems and
life on Earth are necessarily similar. Environmentalgeometries.
determinism and the panspermia hypothesis areAdditionally, we often confuse complexity or
far from proven. There is no guarantee that weorderliness with artificiality. As the example of
are not unique, as per the Rare Earth hypothesis.quasars teaches us, not all regular or constant or
But the likelihood of finding life in one form orstrong or complex signals are artificial. Even the
another elsewhere and everywhere in thevery use of language may be a uniquely human
Universe is high.phenomenon - though most xenolinguists contest
The widely-accepted mediocrity principle (Earth issuch exclusivity.
a typical planet) and its reification, theMoreover, as Wittgenstein observed, language is
controversial Drake (or Sagan) Equation usuallyan essentially private affair: if a lion were to
predicts the existence of thousands of Aliensuddenly speak, we would not have understood it.
civilizations - though only a vanishingly smallModern verificationist and referentialist linguistic
fraction of these are likely to communicate withtheories seek to isolate the universals of language,
us.so as to render all languages capable of translation
But, if this is true, to quote Italian-American- but they are still a long way off. Clarke's Third
physicist Enrico Fermi: "where are they?". FermiLaw says that Alien civilizations well in advance of
postulated that ubiquitous technologically advancedhumanity may be deploying investigative methods
civilizations should be detectable - yet they areand communicating in dialects undetectable even in
not! (The Fermi Paradox).principle by humans.
This paucity of observational evidence may beArgument Number 6: They are avoiding us
owing to the fact that our galaxy is old. In tenAdvanced Alien civilizations may have found ways
billion years of its existence, the majority of Aliento circumvent the upper limit of the speed of light
races are likely to have simply died out or been(for instance, by using wormholes). If they have
extinguished by various cataclysmic events. Orand if UFO sightings are mere hoaxes and bunk
maybe older and presumably wiser races are not(as is widely believed by most scientists), then we
as bent as we are on acquiring colonies. Remoteare back to Fermi's "where are they".
exploration may have supplanted material probesOne possible answer is they are avoiding us
and physical visits to wild locales such as Earth.because of our misconduct (example: the alleged
Aliens exist on our very planet. The minds ofdestruction of the environment) or because of
newborn babies and of animals are as inaccessibleour traits (for instance, our innate belligerence). Or
to us as would be the minds of little green menmaybe the Earth is a galactic wildlife reserve or a
and antenna-wielding adductors. Moreover, as wezoo or a laboratory (the Zoo hypothesis) and the
demonstrated in the previous chapter, even adultAliens do not wish to contaminate us or subvert
human beings from the same cultural backgroundour natural development. This falsely assumes
are as aliens to one another. Language is anthat all Alien civilizations operate in unison and
inadequate and blunt instrument when it comes tounder a single code (the Uniformity of Motive
communicating our inner worlds.fallacy).
Argument Number 2: Their technology is tooBut how would they know to avoid contact with
advancedus? How would they know of our misdeeds and
If Aliens really want to communicate with us, whybad character?
would they use technologies that are incompatibleOur earliest radio signals have traversed no more
with our level of technological progress? When wethan 130 light years omnidirectionally. Out television
discover primitive tribes in the Amazon, do weemissions are even closer to home. What other
communicate with them via e-mail or videosource of information could Aliens have except
conferencing - or do we strive to learn theirour own self-incriminating transmissions? None. In
language and modes of communication andother words, it is extremely unlikely that our
emulate them to the best of our ability?reputation precedes us. Luckily for us, we are
Of course there is always the possibility that wevirtual unknowns.
are as far removed from Alien species as antsAs early as 1960, the implications of an encounter
are from us. We do not attempt to interface withwith an ETI were clear:
insects. If the gap between us and Alien races in"Evidences of its existence might also be found in
the galaxy is too wide, they are unlikely to wantartifacts left on the moon or other planets. The
to communicate with us at all.consequences for attitudes and values are
Argument Number 3: We are looking in all theunpredictable, but would vary profoundly in
wrong placesdifferent cultures and between groups within
If life is, indeed, a defining feature (an extensivecomplex societies; a crucial factor would be the
property) of our Universe, it should benature of the communication between us and the
anisotropically, symmetrically, and equallyother beings. Whether or not earth would be
distributed throughout the vast expanse of space.inspired to an all-out space effort by such a
In other words, never mind where we turn ourdiscovery is moot: societies sure of their own
scientific instruments, we should be able to detectplace in the universe have disintegrated when
life or traces of life.confronted by a superior society, and others have
Still, technological and budgetary constraints havesurvived even though changed. Clearly, the better
served to dramatically narrow the scope of thewe can come to understand the factors involved
search for intelligent transmissions. Vast swathesin responding to such crises the better prepared
of the sky have been omitted from the researchwe may be."
agenda as have been many spectrum frequencies.(Brookins Institute - Proposed Studies on the
SETI scientists assume that Alien species are asImplications of Peaceful Space Activities for
concerned with efficiency as we are and,Human Affairs, 1960)
therefore, unlikely to use certain wastefulPerhaps we should not be looking forward to the
methods and frequencies to communicate with us.First Encounter. It may also be our last.
This assumption of interstellar scarcity is, of