| With all the satellite radio users out there and all | | | | satellites, Department of Defense radar systems |
| the radio waves coming in perhaps we should use | | | | and commercial satellite assets. No sense in |
| this as a background pattern like a radar grid. | | | | launching an ICBM anti-missile at a meteorite |
| Thus if there is a disruption passing thru like an | | | | coming in and burning up in the atmosphere or a |
| airliner, well we have a back up system in case | | | | piece of space junk falling out of low-orbit. |
| our radar systems go down. | | | | We need to have multiple data sets to determine |
| If there is an unidentified flying object, which | | | | exactly what something is, exactly how fast it is |
| shows up as a disruption anomaly with this field in | | | | traveling and exactly what threat it could |
| an area, which is not a known flight path | | | | potentially be. By having more data, along with our |
| trajectory for airlines or military then we should | | | | top of the line super computers, we also can |
| start tracking it; because it could indeed be a | | | | increase our kill rate chances of shooting down |
| threat to our national security. | | | | any potential threat. So I hope you will consider all |
| Additionally using anomalies from several sources | | | | this in 2006. |
| such as data coming back from high-tech weather | | | | |